{"id":1074,"date":"2025-09-05T16:54:57","date_gmt":"2025-09-05T19:54:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/?p=1074"},"modified":"2025-09-05T16:55:00","modified_gmt":"2025-09-05T19:55:00","slug":"tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/","title":{"rendered":"BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT THEME NO. 1,389 AND PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILITY OR LABOR FRAUD?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Maria Eduarda X. Soares and Helo\u00edsa Nogueira<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On April 12, 2025, the Supreme Federal Court (STF) recognized the general significance of Theme 1,389, which addresses the validity of hiring workers through a legal entity\u2014a practice popularly known as <em>\"pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o\"<\/em>\u2014which has become one of the most controversial topics in labor law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Upon recognizing the general significance of the issue, the Supreme Federal Court (STF) suspended proceedings addressing the matter at all court levels and assumed the role of settling the issue, which currently divides courts, companies, and workers<strong>, <\/strong>including questions regarding the jurisdiction of Labor Courts, the legality of the hiring arrangement, and the burden of proof.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is worth noting that once the STF establishes a settled understanding\u2014whether by recognizing the validity of <em>hiring workers as legal entities (*pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o*), <\/em>or by rejecting this model\u2014the effects of the STF's decision will reverberate throughout the country, impacting both ongoing and future cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On one hand, proponents of the practice argue that it <em>\"pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o\"<\/em> reflects the dynamic reality of the market, allowing for greater contractual flexibility, cost reduction, and, in some cases, higher net remuneration for the professional. From this perspective, it is a legitimate alternative to the traditional employment model governed by the CLT (Consolidation of Labor Laws), particularly in sectors such as technology, healthcare, communications, and service provision, where autonomy and specialization are highly valued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, from another perspective, critics point out that, in most cases, the practice <em>\"pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o\"<\/em> serves merely as a mechanism for labor fraud, masking relationships characterized by subordination, personal service, regularity, and remuneration\u2014elements typical of an employment relationship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is undeniable that by removing guarantees such as paid vacation, the 13th-month salary, FGTS (Severance Indemnity Fund) contributions, and social security coverage, various risks are shifted to the worker, and the network of rights ensured by the CLT is weakened. However, some argue that <em>\"pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o\"<\/em> this could represent a legitimate hiring alternative, especially for highly specialized activities involving a lower degree of subordination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The debate reached the Supreme Federal Court (STF) precisely because Labor Courts\u2014even in light of prior rulings that relaxed the rigidity of the CLT (Consolidation of Labor Laws) in favor of free enterprise\u2014continue to recognize employment relationships in situations previously viewed as a type of \u201c<em>\"pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o\"<\/em> abusive\u201d practice. This tension highlights the conflict between the Brazilian legal tradition of worker protection and the need to modernize hiring practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling on Theme 1389 will have a definite impact on thousands of pending lawsuits and could redefine the contours of the relationship between capital and labor in Brazil. Beyond the legal issue itself, what is at stake is the very concept of decent work in an economy that is modernizing and increasingly driven by technology and informality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To illustrate the impact of the Supreme Court (STF) decision, let\u2019s look at the numbers. The difference between the CLT (standard employment contract) and PJ (independent contractor\/legal entity) models goes beyond the status of employee versus service provider; it directly affects the amounts received and the capacity to build wealth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the <strong>CLT<\/strong>model, a gross salary of R$ 5,000.00 results in a net amount of approximately R$ 3,939.86 for the employee, after deductions for Social Security (INSS) and Income Tax. The company, in turn, bears costs such as the FGTS (Severance Indemnity Fund) and the 13th-month salary\u2014benefits for the employee that do not add to the monthly take-home pay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the <strong>PJ<\/strong>model, however, the same R$ 5,000.00 remuneration would incur lower fixed tax costs, resulting in higher net pay\u2014around R$ 4,700.00\u2014assuming a tax payment of R$ 300.00 under the *Simples Nacional* tax regime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here, we see a clear difference in the worker's net pay; furthermore, a frequently raised point is that while the <strong>FGTS<\/strong> funds of a CLT worker yield low returns (around 3% per year), a PJ professional has the opportunity to take the difference between their PJ earnings and the amounts that would have gone toward FGTS and INSS, and invest that money independently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In this context, the debate reveals a rarely discussed aspect: the worker's freedom to manage their own financial resources. While the standard employment regime (CLT) offers minimum guarantees regarding compulsory savings via the FGTS (Severance Indemnity Fund) and social security contributions, the \"legal entity\" (PJ) model shifts the responsibility for social protection, building a financial reserve, and private pension planning onto the professional.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If a PJ professional were to invest this amount monthly in a fixed-income product yielding 100% of the CDI rate (approximately 10.75% per year), the total accumulated over three years would be <strong>R$ 41,800.00<\/strong>. This figure is significantly higher than the <strong>R$ 15,011.00<\/strong> that a CLT employee would have in their FGTS account after the same period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Furthermore, it is worth noting that the INSS (National Social Security Institute) no longer commands the same level of trust and credibility. In the first half of this year, a fraud scheme at the institute caused a national outcry; the scheme involved monthly withdrawals from the accounts of retirees and pensioners without their consent or knowledge. The severity of the incident highlights serious internal control failures and heightens the sense of insecurity among those who rely on the benefit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is precisely against this backdrop of distrust regarding social security that the <em>\"pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o\"<\/em> model finds fertile ground to take hold. By opting out of the standard employment relationship and contributing independently, workers could better manage their resources, invest in private pension plans, and build their own safety net, without being held hostage by the instability and weaknesses of the public system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In light of this, the \"PJ\" model (contracting workers as legal entities) emerges as a viable alternative across various economic sectors, given a State that fails to provide social security or safeguard workers' rights, and a society that values \u200b\u200bfreedom and informality over security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ultimately, the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling could signal either a shift toward the full flexibilization of labor relations or a reaffirmation of the central role of social protection within the Brazilian legal framework. Thus, striking a balance between economic efficiency for companies and worker dignity will undoubtedly be the key to this debate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is therefore necessary to consider whether the rigid model of the CLT (Consolidation of Labor Laws)\u2014conceived over 80 years ago\u2014is still the one that best meets the demands of a globalized, digital, and dynamic market. <em>\"pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o\"<\/em>, often cast as a villain, can also represent freedom of choice, autonomy over one\u2019s own career, and the chance to avoid dependence on an inefficient State and increasingly fragile social security institutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Relying on the government to manage every aspect of one's professional life may be riskier today than taking individual control of one's own future. Faced with formal guarantees that prove increasingly fragile in practice, it may be time to recognize that true economic security lies less in legal promises and more in the freedom of the parties to consciously define the course of their own relationship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>OLIVEIRA, M. <\/strong>INSS scam: retirees targeted by false promises of refunds. Available at: &lt;https:\/\/www.cnnbrasil.com.br\/economia\/financas\/golpe-do-inss-aposentados-sao-alvo-de-falsas-promessas-de-devolucao\/&gt;. Accessed on: Aug. 27, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IBRAHIM, F.<\/strong> \"Pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o\" [contracting as a legal entity] and social protection: Social Security challenges in Brazil \u2013 Migalhas. Available at: &lt;https:\/\/www.migalhas.com.br\/coluna\/previdencialhas\/435450\/pejotizacao-e-protecao-social-desafios-da-previdencia-no-brasil&gt;. Accessed on: Aug. 27, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>SPONZA, C<\/strong>. Is \"pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o\" to blame for the Social Security deficit? Available at: . Accessed on: Aug. 27, 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Maria Eduarda X. Soares e Helo\u00edsa Nogueira O Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) reconheceu, em 12 de abril de 2025, a repercuss\u00e3o geral do Tema 1.389, que trata da validade da contrata\u00e7\u00e3o de trabalhadores via pessoa jur\u00eddica, pr\u00e1tica popularmente chamada de pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o, que se tornou um dos temas mais controversos do direito do trabalho. Ao reconhecer [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1074","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA? - Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA? - Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Maria Eduarda X. Soares e Helo\u00edsa Nogueira O Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) reconheceu, em 12 de abril de 2025, a repercuss\u00e3o geral do Tema 1.389, que trata da validade da contrata\u00e7\u00e3o de trabalhadores via pessoa jur\u00eddica, pr\u00e1tica popularmente chamada de pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o, que se tornou um dos temas mais controversos do direito do trabalho. Ao reconhecer [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-05T19:54:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-05T19:55:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/compartilhamento.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Heloisa Nogueira\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Heloisa Nogueira\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Heloisa Nogueira\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/90b58a82f337958c24ed0b1767c221c0\"},\"headline\":\"TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA?\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-05T19:54:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-05T19:55:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1352,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/#organization\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\\\/\",\"name\":\"TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA? - Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-05T19:54:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-05T19:55:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/\",\"name\":\"Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/compartilhamento.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/compartilhamento.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675,\"caption\":\"Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/90b58a82f337958c24ed0b1767c221c0\",\"name\":\"Heloisa Nogueira\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nogueiraengel.com.br\\\/en_US\\\/author\\\/heloisa\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA? - Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA? - Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados","og_description":"Maria Eduarda X. Soares e Helo\u00edsa Nogueira O Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) reconheceu, em 12 de abril de 2025, a repercuss\u00e3o geral do Tema 1.389, que trata da validade da contrata\u00e7\u00e3o de trabalhadores via pessoa jur\u00eddica, pr\u00e1tica popularmente chamada de pejotiza\u00e7\u00e3o, que se tornou um dos temas mais controversos do direito do trabalho. Ao reconhecer [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/","og_site_name":"Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados","article_published_time":"2025-09-05T19:54:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-05T19:55:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/compartilhamento.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Heloisa Nogueira","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Heloisa Nogueira","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/"},"author":{"name":"Heloisa Nogueira","@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/#\/schema\/person\/90b58a82f337958c24ed0b1767c221c0"},"headline":"TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA?","datePublished":"2025-09-05T19:54:57+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-05T19:55:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/"},"wordCount":1352,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/#organization"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/","url":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/","name":"TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA? - Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-09-05T19:54:57+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-05T19:55:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/tema-1-389-do-stf-e-a-pejotizacao-flexibilizacao-ou-fraude-trabalhista\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"TEMA 1.389 DO STF E A PEJOTIZA\u00c7\u00c3O: FLEXIBILIZA\u00c7\u00c3O OU FRAUDE TRABALHISTA?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/#website","url":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/","name":"Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/#organization","name":"Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados","url":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/compartilhamento.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/compartilhamento.jpg","width":1200,"height":675,"caption":"Nogueira Engel Sociedade de Advogados"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/#\/schema\/person\/90b58a82f337958c24ed0b1767c221c0","name":"Heloisa Nogueira","url":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/author\/heloisa\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1074","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1074"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1074\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1076,"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1074\/revisions\/1076"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1074"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1074"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nogueiraengel.com.br\/en_US\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1074"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}